[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Why was the Meadow Creek windfarm rejected?  

Credit:  By Anthony Congi, KIDK CBS 3, www.kidk.com 26 August 2010 ~~

BONNEVILLE COUNTY – At the end of last night’s Planning and Zoning meeting, Ridgeline Energy learned that it’s proposed Meadow Creek wind farm was rejected.

Board members debated until nearly midnight, but ultimately decided the main problem with Ridgeline’s proposal was that it would not allow future residential development near the project.

“Their argument was that if you have windmills full length along that ridge line, that it creates a fence or a wall that prohibits development from moving through,” explains Bonneville County Zoning Administrator, Steve Serr.

During the hearing, board members thought there were issues that needed to be addressed in the ordinance itself. Those issues were taken up in the work session following the hearing.

“I believe that what occurred last night is that they got into the second meeting during the first meeting; and started to debate the merits of wind farms in G-1 grazing and how the ordinance applied to them. As so I think they concentrated more on that than our application itself,” said Randy Gardner, Project Manager for Ridgeline Energy.

But does this signal a change in the county’s approach to future wind farms?

“What does that mean for companies like Ridgeline? Does it make it easier or harder for them?” I asked Serr.

“I don’t know,” he replied. “Because the actual parameters of what they’re going to modify, that’s subject to public hearing, review, edit, rewrite.”

“We of course would’ve preferred that we would have been approved but this doesn’t change much. This is going to go on,” said Gardner.

So far, Ridgeline is undecided what they’ll do next. They could file an appeal within 10 days, or re-file the claim in a different manner.

As far as changing the ordinance goes, Ridgeline feels that they submitted their application with the current ordinance; and it should be reviewed under the current one.

And if the county want to change it, Ridgline says it should be a separate issue.

Source:  By Anthony Congi, KIDK CBS 3, www.kidk.com 26 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch