[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Plans for two north windfarms rejected  

Credit:  By Cheryl Livingstone, The Press and Journal, www.pressandjournal.co.uk 24 August 2010 ~~

Plans for two windfarms on the landscape surrounding Dava Moor and Tomatin were rejected by Highland Council’s planning committee yesterday.

Renewables firm Infinergy and Cawdor Estates’ proposals for 17 turbines at Tom nan Clach, and Eurus Energy UK’s proposed development of 31 turbines as part of the Glenkirk windfarm on the hills overlooking Dava, both failed to get the support of councillors.

Fears were raised about their significant detrimental impact on the visual amenity of the ruined Lochindorb Castle – where Alexander Stewart, 1st Earl of Buchan, and known as the Wolf of Badenoch, had his lair – and its surroundings, some of which are classed as being areas of great landscape value (AGLV).

Objectors also voiced their concerns about the developments’ effect on the tourism industry of nearby towns, claiming most of their visitors would not return if they were faced with wind turbines in the hills.

After councillors inspected the locations in the morning, they were faced by a group of banner-carrying protesters outside the local authority’s headquarters in Inverness.

Peter Moynan, project director for SKM Enviros, who did the environmental impact assessment for Eurus Energy UK, argued that the potential impact on the landscape had been significantly overestimated.

He said: “We believe that from key locations in the AGLV where it will be visible, the windfarm will appear +on the periphery of the natural view-shed without compromising the scale and simplistic qualities of the moorland and the AGLV designation.”

Charles Sandham, chief executive of Infinergy, claimed its development was a “compact and detailed design” which had received a “mountain” of support from local communities.

Inverness councillor Thomas Prag said: “I am not pro or anti-windfarms and I do think that there are some that do add to the views of the landscape.

“However, this is not the case here. What we have is extremely rare, in the UK and the rest of Europe. We have a very special landscape and, on visual grounds, this particular windfarm would be in the wrong place.”

Badenoch councillor Stuart Black added: “It’s marvellous that we still have an unspoiled area like this. It’s wonderful and we need to keep it this way.”

The committee agreed to lodge an objection to the Glenkirk windfarm proposals and its 10-mile access road, including a bridge over the River Findhorn. This application will be decided by the Scottish Government because of its size.

The committee also agreed to back planning officer’s recommendation and reject the smaller Tom nan Clach application. Both decisions were unanimous.

Mr Moynan said later: “It wasn’t unexpected given the officer’s recommendation. Now we have to wait for the written report before taking any further action.”

Charles Sandham, chief executive of Infinergy, said the company would be appealing against the council’s decision.

Source:  By Cheryl Livingstone, The Press and Journal, www.pressandjournal.co.uk 24 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.