[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wrong use of cherished resource  

Credit:  Times Argus, www.timesargus.com 22 August 2010 ~~

As a 28-year summer resident of Craftsbury and Wolcott, I wish to voice my objections to the proposed “community” wind power project on top of the very nearby, highly visible Lowell mountains. This portion of Vermont, from Route 14 west to Montgomery and beyond, is mountainous, forested, and quiet. I call it the “Northwest Kingdom”.

Here is a question of future vision and wise resource use in this (pleasantly) overlooked portion of Vermont. It sits coolly above a crowded, intense eastern U.S., whose hot summers are likely to get hotter. It is already a recreational destination for Americans and Canadians. In the long-term, retirees, summer residents, and recreational visitors are a way to build community and economy, without placing demands on the schools. They bring money and jobs; support of education and culture; and support of quality medical care. They increase the value of local real estate. In contrast, a large industrial installation which levels those mountaintops and crowds their skyline does not build community or property values. It is not the important resource here.

I understand there is (very rightly) an intense statewide discussion about future energy sources and concern that Vermont is vulnerable to “outside interests.” The Lowell project, billed as a “community” effort, is in fact an exercise in “block-breaking.” One small town has been showered with funds and attention, and the proposed facility is not close to most of its residents. Green Mountain Power is Canadian-owned. Also, the actual economics and logistics of the proposed power generation should be scrutinized very closely.

This region has drawn creative people to its natural sanctuary for over a century. Wallace Stegner is perhaps the best known, but many others have made similar life choices. We don’t have the sea to keep us humble, we have the mountains. Act 250 serves to protect them, as viewsheds, watersheds, and places of pilgrimage. Industry was traditionally in the valleys – to put it on the ridgeline is hubris, an ancient Greek word for overweening human pride. I sincerely hope we won’t overreach this time.


Trappe, Md.

Source:  Times Argus, www.timesargus.com 22 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.