[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Trouble brewing?  

Credit:  Michael Peeling, Standard-Freeholder, standard-freeholder.com 16 August 2010 ~~

CORNWALL – A U.S. environmental group’s call for a moratorium on wind power development in the Upper St. Lawrence River Valley isn’t likely to affect a project in South Dundas Township.

Save The River, a Clayton, N.Y.-based group, put out the call after “a careful review of recent data showing potentially high avian and bat mortality from the first six months of operation of the Wolfe Island Wind project, the only operating wind project in the region.”

“Without a full picture of the impacts of wind energy development along the Upper St. Lawrence River, it is irresponsible to move forward with the wind projects currently in development at this time,” said Save The River executive director Jennifer Caddick. “Communities along the St. Lawrence River have worked hard to protect the river’s water quality and wildlife for many years. A precautionary approach is the only way to ensure that the St. Lawrence River ecosystem remains vibrant and healthy.”

A project still in the environmental assessment phase located near Brinston in South Dundas Township has been looking at the potential for bird and bat deaths near the site of its South Branch project, said Cathy Weston, president of Prowind Canada.

The South Branch wind farm is the United Counties of Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry’s first wind development project and would generate, at peak capacity, 30 megawatts of electricity from a maximum of 15 turbines – enough to power about 25,000 homes.

It’s one of six projects in the Upper St. Lawrence River Valley cited by Save The River as potential threats to birds and bats.

Source:  Michael Peeling, Standard-Freeholder, standard-freeholder.com 16 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.