Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Please note that opinion pieces (including letters, editorials, and blogs), reflect the viewpoints of their authors; National Wind Watch does not necessarily agree with them in their entirety or endorse them in any way, nor should it be implied that the writers endorse National Wind Watch.
Vote took wind-project oversight out of local communities’ hands
Credit: Sentinel and Enterprise, www.sentinelandenterprise.com 13 August 2010 ~~
In mid-July, my opponent, incumbent Rep. Harold Naughton Jr., D-Clinton, alone among area state representatives, voted to oppose House Bill 4687, which would have required town-election voter approval of proposed local wind-energy project sites.
Instead, he voted to place wind-energy project siting discretion in local wind-energy permitting boards given only 120 days to review wind-energy project proposals that are often complex and problematic.
We know that such permitting boards will be subject to the usual lobbying and influence peddling.
His vote paves the way for placement of unsightly wind turbines all over the lovely hills of Northboro, Boylston, Clinton, Lancaster and Sterling.
He again has demonstrated his utter contempt for constituents’ wishes and best interests. He should be voted out of office Nov. 2.
JAMES GETTENS Republican candidate for 12th Worcester District state representative
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
![]() (via Stripe) |
![]() (via Paypal) |
Share: