[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Vote split on county wind energy ordinance  

Credit:  by Sheila Gardner, The Record-Courier, www.recordcourier.com 11 August 2010 ~~

Douglas County commissioners voted 3-2 Thursday to approve the first reading of an ordinance that eases restrictions on placing wind turbines in residential areas.

Commissioners Mike Olson, Dave Brady and Doug Johnson voted in favor of the measure with Greg Lynn and Nancy McDermid in opposition.

The zoning text amendment, if approved on second reading, amends requirements for small and micro wind energy conversion systems including parcel size, height and setback requirements.

It was approved 5-1 last month by planning commissioners.

In recommending approval, associate county planner Dirk Goering said the proposed ordinance would encourage county policy to support development of nonpolluting renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and geothermal energy.

Debate centered on whether such systems would be noisy and impact views.

“The ordinance is really a balancing act,” Goering said.

He pointed out that no one has the statutory right to a view.

Longtime resident Gary Carsten said he appreciated the effort Goering put into researching the subject.

He encouraged the county to monitor a similar ordinance in Carson City.

“The neighbors loved it, but within a week, there was a huge public outcry about the noise,” he said. “Keep an eye on the resolution of what happens in Carson City before we adopt it here.”

The 43-year resident of Douglas County said people live here because of the quality of life.

“Alternative energy is going to be here. Let’s approach it with cautious optimism and not get carried away with leniency,” he said.

Resident Donna Buddington said she favored alternative energy but was concerned whether owners of micro energy systems would keep up maintenance.

“These things take a lot of maintenance and can become increased liability,” she said.

Buddington said she lived next door to an abandoned solar panel system. She urged the board to proceed carefully.

“It’s a lot easier to keep the ordinance tight than to loosen it up,” she said.

Olson said he was glad the county was moving forward on the issue.

“My concern is that we encourage the use of newer technology,” he said.

McDermid said maintenance and abandonment of systems could become a liability.

Goering said there was no inspection program within the ordinance.

“It would be complaint driven,” he said.

Lynn said he liked the ordinance the way it was.

“What do we want our community to look like? Dotted with wind generators?” he asked. “Look around the country. There’s one constant – they are noisy.”

He said the technology is coming, but it’s not here.

“What we’re going to do is create neighbor vs. neighbor issues,” Lynn said.

Johnson said he’d like the ordinance to permit the structures on one-acre parcels.

Currently, the restriction is five acres, but the new ordinance would reduce it to two acres.

“I don’t want to overregulate, but I don’t want to get antiquated yard ornaments,” Johnson said.

Olson said he believes technology would be improved with “American ingenuity.”

Source:  by Sheila Gardner, The Record-Courier, www.recordcourier.com 11 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.