[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind energy is a bad bargain  

Credit:  The Martha's Vineyard Times, www.mvtimes.com 12 August 2010 ~~

Besides fearlessness – Republican gubernatorial candidate Charlie Baker appeared Sunday evening in the unforgiving Democrat precincts of Chilmark – Mr. Baker also demonstrated a reasoned devotion to data and math when it comes to the Patrick Administration’s swoon over wind energy. He said he couldn’t make sense of it. Neither can we, not of wind energy plants in the state and federal waters surrounding the Vineyard —but nowhere else at all in state waters – and not dotting the Vineyard landscape either.

Mr. Baker attended a panel discussion at the Chilmark Community Center hosted by POINT (Protect Our Islands Now for Tomorrow). As Times writer Janet Hefler explained, POINT was known as “Let Vineyarders Decide,” a grass-roots organization formed last September to protest the state’s Ocean Management Plan (OMP) for offshore industrial wind turbine development around Martha’s Vineyard. POINT invited the governor, who did not attend, and another gubernatorial candidate Tim Cahill, who didn’t show up either but sent a statement.

Enthusiasm for the governor’s plan was in short supply among the Island panelists, who allowed themselves to expand windily on the evening’s topic. It was also in short supply among the 200 in attendance.

Mr. Baker, speaking after the panelists had exhausted themselves, was short and sweet.

“It’s a big-bet strategy economically, a big-bet strategy financially, a big-bet strategy environmentally, and a big- bet strategy technologically,” Mr. Baker said of Gov. Deval Patrick’s push for wind turbines and renewable energy that must be created in Massachusetts, a lot of it near us.

“I’m a data guy and a numbers guy, and always have been,” Mr. Baker said. “And my biggest issue with all the issues associated with offshore wind is I’ve never been able to figure out how the math works.”

It doesn’t work.

It’s all tax credits and subsidies, artificially inflated electricity rates, and political illusion. Mr. Baker said the projects require 15- to 20-year contracts to recover the investment plus profit. But, looking out another 20 years, he asked, “Do we really think buying power from wind farms that cost two and a half to three times per kilowatt hour over what we’re already paying as the fourth highest cost of electricity is an economically smart bet for the next 20 years?” Mr. Baker asked.

Mr. Baker, in his brief remarks, criticized the 2008 Green Communities Act requirement that renewable energy used in Massachusetts must be produced in the state. He asked, why not buy proven, sustainable, and cheap alternative energy from other sources, such as hydropower from Quebec. These are alternatives that the Patrick Administration would prohibit, in pursuit of wind turbines that will harm us, and cost us more while doing so.

“If somebody has already built a mousetrap, well, then take it,” Mr. Baker told the crowd at the Community Center. “You don’t have to invest in any of the risk associated with whether or not it works. Somebody else has already paid for that.”

POINT’s mission is an important one. The governor would surround the Vineyard with wind turbine factories and dot the Vineyard landscape with them also.

Weighing the benefits and detriments of wind power finds higher costs and little contribution to our energy future on the one hand and, on the other, enormous detrimental effects on the unique cultural, historic, environmental, and economic values that we enjoy and on which our economy is based. It’s too high a price.

Source:  The Martha's Vineyard Times, www.mvtimes.com 12 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.