News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind towers can pit neighbour against neighbour  

Credit:  By Toby Barrett, Simcoe Reformer, simcoereformer.ca 11 August 2010 ~~

This spring I attended the installation of a windmill in Jarvis – at the Walpole Antique Farm Equipment Association.

The tower is 100 years old, 40 feet high and part of our farming heritage. What is not part of our farming heritage is the plan for hundreds of industrial wind towers across our area. Far from 40 feet, these towers are 400 feet high at the tip of the blade -that’s two-thirds the height of the twin stacks at OPG Nanticoke.

My experience, talking to people who live in areas with wind turbines, is that you will either grow to hate them, or ignore them. People contacting my offices fall into two distinct categories; those in the business or holding a lease, and secondly, those with concerns about health, bird migration, or the visual impact. The former are in favour, the latter oppose – and often they are neighbours.

People in Toronto have made it clear that they do not want to look at wind towers – and, as a result of the Scarborough Bluffs lobby, Dalton McGuinty has proposed offshore setbacks for wind towers of 5 kilometres. The setback ensures turbines are placed some 4.5 kms further away than those on rural land. Coupled with the 550 metre setback from homes it ensures you will not see a second wind tower near Toronto.

Living near a wind tower is not advised by three local families who have approached me with health problems that prevent them, on occasion, from living in their homes. A Clear Creek delegation to Norfolk County council suggested that of 140 houses in the area 40 were for sale, vacant or abandoned – because of towers.

One given, for our future among wind towers in Haldimand and Norfolk, is it pits neighbour against neighbour. But you will not see rulings from county council, nor see any of the yellow roadside zoning signs because McGuinty’s Green Energy Act has neutered our municipal process – our local politicians are allowed no say on wind – while the environment assessment process for green energy has been so watered down it has been rendered toothless.

While the Green Energy Act all but guarantees approval for industrial wind power, it can’t completely silence those with questions or concerns. Across Ontario, 58 municipalities – including Norfolk County – have passed resolutions calling for a moratorium on construction pending further research.

During legislative debate this spring, I voiced concern on behalf of area residents: “That impact on my riding deserves input from municipal councillors. It was a mistake to take away those oversight powers. In one fell swoop legislation removed all rights from my constituents and their locally elected representatives.”

In the Legislature I also relayed concern about bird migration: “I am now hearing from duck hunters concerned about the flyways from the Prairies, Long Point across Lake Erie to the United States.” I’ve talked with local bird experts indicating the impact could be severe, and with Pennsylvania State representative John Hornaman, who is advocating towers out in Lake Erie.

For years I have spoken with people who want a windmill to get off the grid. Now, because of McGuinty subsidies, I find myself speaking with those who want a windmill to get on the grid.

We’re planning an Energy and our Environment symposium this fall. Contact me at toby. barrett@pc.ola.org.

Toby Barrett is MPP for the riding of Haldimand Norfolk.

Source:  By Toby Barrett, Simcoe Reformer, simcoereformer.ca 11 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.