Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wellfleet selectmen raise objections to wind energy bill
Credit: By Marilyn Miller, Provincetown Banner, www.wickedlocal.com 27 May 2010 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
WELLFLEET – The Wellfleet selectmen, who on March 30 killed the possibility of an industrial wind turbine in town, voted on Tuesday to send a letter to state Sen. Rob O’Leary and state Rep. Sarah Peake, urging them to kill House Bill 4687, the Wind Energy Siting Reform Act.
They were warned about this act several weeks earlier by two citizens who had opposed the Wellfleet turbine, and Selectman Ira Wood drafted the letter which the board then agreed to send to O’Leary and Peake. In the letter, Wood mentioned that the state Senate had already passed the wind energy legislation but that the House had not taken action on it yet.
“This is an act relative to comprehensive planning for land-based wind turbines,” Wood said. Quoting from the letter to O’Leary and Peake, he continued, “The Wellfleet Board of Selectmen is writing to ask you to oppose this act. It is our opinion that this bill is not in the best interests of the citizens of Wellfleet or the Commonwealth.”
The letter points out that the act “waives all state and local laws, bylaws and regulations, including those regarding health, safety and local zoning for wind energy projects; allows the [state] Energy Facilities Siting Board to override local decisions on the siting of industrial wind turbines and associated infrastructures such as roads and transmission lines; exempts wind facilities from environmental laws that others must follow, and replaces those with standards that can be applied or waived at the discretion of the Energy Facilities Siting Board.”
Wood’s letter also observes that the bill “prohibits the traditional rights of participation in the Energy Facilities Siting Board permit review process. Although we are well aware that government must take action on the production of clean energy, we find this to be an affront to the concept of home rule, and ask that you take whatever steps are necessary to prevent passage of this act.”
The board voted unanimously to send the letter.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Paypal) |
(via Stripe) |
Share: