LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind power not worth the cost; Wind farms are unreliable, inefficient and expensive 

Credit:  By Rolf Westgard, The Minnesota Daily, www.mndaily.com ~~

U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar has just approved the $2 billion Cape Wind project, which will place 130 turbines off the coast of Cape Cod. The project will receive large taxpayer subsidies and use the money to buy its 130 turbines from Siemens of Germany. The project has a nameplate capacity of 468 megawatts (MW), but U.S. wind farms overall averaged output at 24 percent of nameplate capacity in 2008 and 2009.

In testimony before the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board, the developer said that in summer, when winds are weakest, Cape Wind will produce an average of 100MW. A medium-sized coal plant like Xcel Energy’s Allen S. King Generating Plant at Bayport, Minn., produces at five times that output throughout the year. This suggests rate increases for power customers to pay for this costly program.

U.S. Rep. William Delahunt, D-Mass., blasted the project and provided his own estimates: “This will be the most expensive and most heavily subsidized offshore wind farm in the country at over $2.5 billion, with power costs to the region that will be at least double,” he said. In a recent offshore wind contract negotiated between National Grid and a Rhode Island wind developer, the rates for power run two to three times higher than electricity generated at other power plants. Regulators recently rejected a similar deal as too expensive for ratepayers.

Since wind turns itself on and off, the electric grid manager needs a backup natural gas peaker plant which can be turned on quickly when the wind fails. In Texas, which has three times the wind power of any other state, customers can be interrupted when there is a major drop in wind energy.

Also in Texas, T. Boone Pickens’ giant wind farm plan for the Midwest has come a cropper, and Pickens is looking for places to put the turbines he has on order from General Electric. Goodhue County, Minn., is currently in his sights. I suggest holding onto our wallets if he comes to the Twin Cities.

Rolf Westgard, Geological Society of America, University volunteer faculty

Source:  By Rolf Westgard, The Minnesota Daily, www.mndaily.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky