[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Lotus wind farm backed by one vote  

A controversial scheme to develop a wind farm at Lotus Cars headquarters was finally approved tonight – by one vote.

South Norfolk Council’s planning committee voted 8-7 in favour of the project which will provide all Lotus’s energy requirements at its site at Hethel with spare electricity to power an estimated 1,000-plus homes every year.

The committee heard strong objections from local residents who claim the three 120-metre high turbines will blight their community, as well as comments from supporters – a 626-name petition in favour of the wind farm having been submitted.

Colin Rudd, of Bracon Ash and Hethel Parish Council, said they opposed the development on the grounds of visual impact, noise and interference with TV signals from the nearby Tacolneston masts.

He claimed the TV reception in thousands of homes would suffer. “We are looking at 20,000 people being badly affected. The repercussions could be horrendous” he said.

Neighbouring resident Stephen Watson disputed the accuracy of developer Ecotricity’s photo montage of the site and produced his own version to illustrate the visual impact of the turbines which will be built in the middle of the Lotus test track.

“These turbines are huge, they will dominate the countryside for miles around,” he said.

Simon Wood, technical director of Lotus, said the wind farm was not “make or break” for the business but stressed it would meet all their energy needs at Hethel.

“It provides part of our strategy of being a green employer in the area and provides us with security of supply and an efficient and clean route of generation,” he explained. “We are a high energy user and we are doing as much as we can to reduce that energy consumption.”

Isobel Downey, of Ecotricity, said it was very difficult to predict whether TV reception would be affected but they would abide by any mitigation measures imposed by the council as one of 14 planning conditions.

Supporter Andrew Boswell of Norfolk County Council said the country was going through an “energy crunch” and needed a mixture of all technologies.

“I think it is absolutely fantastic that Lotus and Ecotricity are trying to make us a leader in renewable energy” he told the committee.

Martin Wynne the committee chairman said that members had to take into account national policies and legislation and weigh these against the concerns and views of the objectors.

Diss Mercury

23 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.