[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Carsington wind turbine protest group is unhappy with claims  

Campaigners fighting plans to build four 335ft-high wind turbines have criticised claims that they would not affect local views.

The Protect Carsington and Hopton Action Group made its comments yesterday, during a public inquiry at Matlock Town Hall into the proposal for turbines at Carsington Pasture.

Jeff Stevenson, landscape and visual consultant for applicant Carsington Wind Energy Ltd, said people in Brassington, Carsington and Hopton, would only see, at most, “the top of rotor blades on one to three turbines.”

But action group leader Janice Southway said the turbines would damage tourism and affect all three historic villages, which include 77 protected buildings.

Her group has collected a 1,400-name protest petition.

She said: “We don’t agree with Mr Stevenson’s comments. There will be a visual impact for villagers and tourists.

“And fewer tourists would reduce takings for pubs, guest houses and restaurants.”

Mr Stevenson told the inquiry that visitors’ appreciation of the landscape would not be affected by the turbines.

He said: “They do attract the eye but I don’t think that they are the resting place of the gaze. People will look around the whole area.”

Earlier in the inquiry, Carsington Wind Energy said that the turbines would power 5,500 homes and that local companies would be able to bid for construction contracts worth about £1.5m.

But Anthony Crean, QC, for Derbyshire Dales District Council, which rejected the original plan, said that the development would harm the landscape.

The eight-day inquiry is expected to conclude tomorrow.

This Is Derbyshire

11 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch