[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windfarm heats up  

Glen Innes Severn Council has maintained its position that its Development Control Plan for windpower generation is council’s policy, despite revelations that some opponents had been broadly aware of the proposal for some time.

Council’s position was re-iterated following a fiery public forum at its monthly meeting on Thursday, at which it was also criticised by opponents for not taking ownership of the problem.

During the forum windfarm opponent and Furracabad valley landowner Frank McAlary QC revealed early in the piece he had been in discussion with co-developer Babcock and Brown about possibly being involved the project, but had decided not to proceed. He also told councillors that ratepayers, not developers, elected them.

“If the windfarm proceeds it will be of no benefit to the landowners in the valley; they will suffer loss of value on their properties.

“You are not their (the developers’) representatives; you should only look to the people who elected you,” Mr McAlary said.

Fellow opponent Maryanne Evans accused council of favouring developers and the obvious monetary contributions it would receive, over local residents.

On the other side of the issue, landowner Rob Dulhunty, who has a contract with the windfarm developers, asked whether council’s DCP should apply to objections from residents who knowingly moved into the path of the windfarm.

In front of a public gallery of 25 people, council firstly heard a presentation by Furracabad resident Ashley Peake who confronted council about what he said was a failure to represent the residents of the Furracabad valley who will not receive monetary gains as a result of the windfarm development, and failure to publicly support a two-kilometre setback.

Ms Evans followed with her presentation where she challenged council to support residents following the formulation of the DCP, by enforcing the 2km setback. She criticised council for using “the politically expedient phrase, this is State-significant development therefore it is out of our hands”.

Ms Evans also challenged council in relation to the so-called section 94 contributions. Under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, council is entitled to one per cent of the development, which she has equated to $1.5million.

Director of Development and Environmental Services Graham Price, who was the principal author of the DCP, told the meeting that initially council did not think it was eligible for the contributions as it was not the consent authority. However if the development goes ahead it will seek the contribution, to be used for things like library books, roads and parks.

In response to the three public addresses, mayor Steve Toms said that he didn’t see any problems with pushing a 2km setback.

At this point landholder Mr Dulhunty, who has a contract with the developers to erect turbines on his property, asked Cr Toms about its position on the 2km setback. Also in the gallery was Allan Fletcher, on whose property a proposed turbine falls within 2km of the Evans’ house.

In response, Cr Toms said the 2km setback applies to existing houses and likely lots for a dwelling.

Elaborated Mr Price: “If the Furracabad development proceeds, council will ask that with any subsequent development the dwelling not be located within the 2km,” Mr Price said.




This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.