[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Council defeated in court windfarm bid  

REDCAR and Cleveland Borough Council has suffered a stinging defeat in its High Court bid to block plans for a massive wind farm off the North-East coast.

Council lawyers argued at London’s High Court that Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, John Hutton, had been wrong not to direct a full public inquiry before giving the go-ahead to the ambitious power generation scheme.

Mr Hutton gave his consent for the construction of the farm by EDF Energy, last September, paving the way for 30 enormous turbines to be built around a mile off the coast at Redcar.

However, the council went to court after receiving thousands of objections from local residents opposed to the wind farm which, they fear, could be an overpowering eyesore.

However, after a costly, two-day, High Court hearing, Mr Justice Sullivan, today dismissed the council’s judicial review challenge.

He said: “I am fundamentally of the view that this application must be rejected. The mere assertion that a wind farm may spoil the outlook generally, and may effect the value of property, is not a sufficient basis on which a challenge can be based.

“In this case, the principle issue, visual impact, is very much a matter of judgment and whether that visual impact would be outweighed by national energy policy”.

He said Mr Hutton had “ample material”, in the form of a “very comprehensive report”, on which he based his decision and had taken into account all factors he was obliged to.

The judge will give more detailed reasons for his decision at a later date.

The wind farm plans involve 30 turbines, up to 132 metres above the high-water mark, standing in rows of ten, approximately 300 metres apart.

But objectors say the turbines would be too close to the shoreline, could overwhelm the town and are bound to impact on local property prices.

1 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.