LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Washington high court holds hearing on wind farm appeal 

The state Supreme Court is weighing whether it has jurisdiction in Kittitas County’s appeal of a wind farm 12 miles northwest of Ellensburg.

The court held a hearing today on whether it should weigh in on the case. In September, Gov. Chris Gregoire approved Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project, as recommended by the state’s Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council.

The council primarily is responsible for permitting large power plants in Washington but in recent years has been allowed to also work on alternative energy projects.

Before passing muster with the site panel and the governor, the project was reduced to 65 large turbines from 121 and developers agreed to keep them farther from homes and cabins. Project officials have said they expect to spend at least $150 million on the project and hope it will begin producing 100 to 150 megawatts of electricity by early 2009.

Neighboring residents and Kittitas County officials have argued against the project for several years, saying it will have negative environmental and visual effects.

Gregoire approved the project over opposition from Kittitas County Commission, which voted unanimously in 2006 to oppose the project.

The state says the governor has the authority to override a county government decision when it relates to the wider interests of the state in connection with power generation.

The project developer wants the court to affirm Gregoire’s approval of the project; the county wants it rejected or at least sent back to Thurston County Superior Court.

theolympian.com

26 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon