[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

‘Bold’ energy bill passes in Massachusetts House  

BOSTON – The House unanimously passed a sweeping energy reform bill yesterday that takes great leaps toward encouraging conservation and forcing utility companies to invest in renewable energy sources as the state looks to position itself as the nation’s leader in clean energy policy.

The bill, which cleared the Senate on Tuesday, now goes to the governor’s desk for his signature, marking the end to what House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi called a “colossal effort” to rethink the way Massachusetts approaches energy and the environment at a time when rising fuel, electricity and home heating costs are hurting consumers.

“This legislation that we passed today is probably the most comprehensive and bold reform that will change the way we consume, produce and deliver energy in the commonwealth that we’ve ever seen in the history of the commonwealth of Massachusetts,” DiMasi said at a press conference after the passage of the bill.

The bill takes several steps toward cutting into the rising cost of electricity by forcing utility companies to invest in resources and technology that will reduce demand before purchasing power that costs more three times as much.

Environment Northeast of Massachusetts estimates that Massachusetts spends $6 billion a year to buy electricity that costs 10 cents per kilowatt hour, while investing only $150 million in home-grown energy efficiencies that can be delivered at 3 cents per kilowatt hours.

“The cleanest power plant is the power plant that never gets built,” said Sam Krasnow, policy advocate and attorney for Environment Northeast. “Energy efficiency is a common-sense and cost-effective energy resource that will now get the priority it deserves.”

The bill also encourages investment in renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and hydro by setting a goal for 15 percent of all Massachusetts energy sales to come from renewable sources by 2020.

The state’s vehicle fleet must begin to convert to high fuel-efficiency vehicles such as hybrids or other alternatives with a goal of converting at least 50 percent of the fleet by 2018.

And municipalities will qualify for a number of grants, loans an financing assistance to invest in conservation and energy-efficiency programs.

Furthermore, the legislation increases the opportunity for businesses and homeowners to save on energy by investing in solar panels, insulation and other energy-saving technologies with a move toward what lawmakers call “net metering,” which allows consumers to fully benefit from being energy-efficient.

Homeowners also can apply to outfit their home with renewable energy systems at no upfront cost and pay for the upgrade over time in their utility bills.

Consumers may not see an immediate savings with these reforms, lawmakers admitted, but House and Senate leaders said the long-term effect will be a move away from expensive fossil fuels to cleaner energy that benefits the environment and reduces cost by lowering demand for power.

DiMasi first filed the comprehensive energy reform bill in January 2007. It was redrafted with input from Gov. Deval L. Patrick and state leaders and passed the House for the first time last November.

In January, the Senate stripped the bill of many tax incentives for businesses and consumers, such as a tax break for individuals who purchase a hybrid car, because the incentives were too costly.

Sen. Michael Morrissey, D-Quincy, who worked extensively on the bill, said $4 for a gallon of gas eliminated the need for tax breaks.

“The market is incentive enough now for people to purchase hybrid vehicles,” he said.

By Matt Murphy, Eagle Boston Bureau

The Berkshire Eagle

27 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.