[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind farm mantra hides the fact that we’ll need nuclear power stations too  

Your recent Word on the Street comments probably reflect the general opinion that wind power is the way forward – because that is what we are told, repeatedly.

This mantra has seeped into the public psyche over the last 10 years, often along with the threat that if we don’t have wind turbines everywhere we will have to have nuclear power stations.

The bad news (that ‘they’ don’t want us to know) is that we will have to have nuclear power stations anyway.

Wind turbines produce pathetic amounts of power in relation to their huge size, and this power is intermittent.

We may well want extra heat and light in the depths of winter, but if it’s a dead calm week with no wind – tough!

The Government target of 20 per cent renewable power is a pipe dream; if it is achieved by plastering turbines all over our countryside, we will still need other power stations to provide for when the wind drops, or a fifth of us are in the dark.

And since nuclear is the only reliable kind of non-CO2 generation… the decision is made for us.

Meanwhile, we opt for wind power. I note that one of your ‘streeters’ says: “Windfarms should be built well away from housing in rural areas.” Good for him – maybe he’s heard that a farming family from Deeping St Nicholas have had to abandon their (now worthless) farmhouse because of the ‘unbearable’ noise problems from the neighbouring wind farm.

France is now calling for a 2km buffer zone between turbines and homes and this call is being taken up around the world as more problems (previously ‘smothered’ by big wind companies) are coming out into the open.

Miriam Crouch

Dunsby Fen,


Boston Standard

25 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch