[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Garrett hearing on performance zoning today  

OAKLAND – The Garrett County Commissioners will be holding a public hearing today at 10:30 a.m. on the issue of performance zoning in Garrett County as a way to prevent wind turbine development.

“The purpose of the meeting or hearing is to receive public comments on a proposal submitted by Barbara Boone and Nancy Nimmich to establish performance zoning throughout all of Garrett County,” Monty Pagenhardt, county administrator, said. “Specifically, their proposal would add a new article entitled ‘performance zoning’ to the (Deep Creek Lake Watershed Ordinance) that would define and prohibit commercial wind turbine structures.”

This issue was brought to the Garrett County Planning Commission on March 31, according to the original letter. As a part of the Deep Creek Lake Watershed Zoning Ordinance, the proposed performance zoning would be applied not only to the Deep Creek area but to ridge tops throughout the county.

When the proposal was presented to the Planning Commission in April, the commission said they did not feel they could support performance zoning, based on the opinion of County Attorney Mike Getty.

Getty’s opinion was that applying zoning to commercial to areas not covered under the existing ordinance would be illegal. In a letter to the county commissioners, Getty said he feels they have the right to use performance zoning in areas within the existing district.

At the April meeting, William Wantz, an attorney from Hagerstown, presented to the Planning Commission an idea to use performance zoning as an amendment to the Deep Creek Lake Watershed area as well as the rest of the county, as it would focus on the impact of a project and not regulating and permitting specific property uses.

Denny Glotfelty, County Commission chairman, said despite their county attorney’s opinion, they were still holding the public hearing in order for those who signed the petition in favor of performance zoning to be heard.

“They’re presenting this to us,” Glotfelty said, “and we have to listen publicly.”

Pagenhardt said it was the commissioners’ decision to have the public hearing in order to let the people voice their opinion. However, he added that the intent of the meeting would be to receive public comment, not for the commissioners or Getty to answer questions.

By Sarah Moses

Cumberland Times-News

24 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.