[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind dominates planning talks  

It was more wind farm-related planning issues Monday evening as the Hays Area Planning Commission continued its process of developing wind power regulations to be applied within city limits.

While no action was taken on the issue, commissioners discussed the possibility of having a more unbiased academic source provide a day of education for local government.

“It seems like it’s going to be a coming thing in the future,” Planning Commissioner Terry Claycamp said. “To have some non-biased, knowledgeable source, we could have questions answered.”

Other commissioners spoke in favor of the suggestion, and Lou Caplan, who acted as chairman since commissioner Larry Gould was absent, said he would look into the matter.

“On the commercial side, I’ve been very frustrated because most of the information we can get … everything seems so slanted in one direction or the other,” Planning Commissioner Jim Fouts said.

Fouts also said the issue of creating regulations is more complicated for the city, which must take into consideration small hobbyist turbines for city use, as well as commercial-sized towers.

Iberdrola has proposed locating eight turbines inside the city-governed 3-mile radius of Hays in conjunction with the proposed Hays Wind project to be located in Ellis County.

An additional two turbines are proposed on Fort Hays State University grounds. But because they would be located on state-owned property, neither the city nor the county would have jurisdiction.

To help alleviate complication, and to ensure the city of Hays will have the ability to expand in the future, the board discussed the possibility of simply banning commercial-sized turbines from the 3-mile radius.

“I’m almost of the thought that because of the development, proximity and size of the towers … thinking maybe we should just ban commercial-size turbines from the 3-mile radius,” Fouts said.

“My thinking on that has nothing to do with whether I’m for or against wind energy. That really, in this particular instance, is immaterial.

“It’s just because of the sheer size of commercial towers,” he said. “That’s really going to tie our hands if the city would develop in the areas of those towers.”

By Kaley Lyon

Hays Daily News

17 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.