[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Tilting at windmills  

Creating electricity from wind that just happens to be blowing might seem like a cheap source of power, but it’s not. As we’ve already seen in Denmark, its high cost requires taxpayer handouts to develop and survive.

Subsidies in Denmark created a lot of wind power, but when the flow from the taxpayer subsidy tap ebbed, so did the industry.

In B.C., wind power will also be subsidized. Creating a welfare-dependent industry in the province may benefit the backers of these projects, but the potential cost to taxpayers is huge and the outlook for an unsubsidized industry is grim.

The Danish government decided to become a leader in wind power production and manufacturing after the first oil crisis in 1973. It guaranteed long-term financing for large wind projects that used Danish-made turbines and obliged electricity utilities to purchase renewable energy from private wind power producers at a fixed price higher than the wholesale price of privately-generated fossil- fuel electricity. By 2000, Denmark had more than 6,000 working windmills and 55 per cent of all wind turbines in the world had been manufactured in Denmark.

After European Union electricity market deregulation in 1999, the guarantees and direct price supports were replaced by a system of tradable green certificates. By 2004, the industry had come to a virtual standstill. Only five windmills were installed in Denmark that year, the lowest in 20 years.

The wind turbine industry in Denmark has rationalized since subsidies were cut back. Between 2002 and 2007, the number of Danish turbine manufacturers shrank from eight to three. Vestas, Denmark’s largest wind turbine manufacturer and the biggest in the world, took over its domestic rival NEG-Micon. Others were bought by foreign electrical giants, such as Germany’s Seimens.

Meanwhile, compared with other countries in Europe, the Danes remain above-average emitters of carbon dioxide. When it’s not windy, Denmark’s power is generated mostly from coal burning plants. Carbon dioxide emissions from burning coal grew by 43 per cent between 2005 and 2006.

The stage is set for a similar boondoggle in B.C. The wind power industry in Canada gets a federal government subsidy of $10 per megawatt hour. But B.C. consumers can expect to dig deeper. The cost of electricity from wind power is about $71 per megawatt hour. That compares to about $48 for natural gas and $25 for electricity produced from B.C.’s heritage hydro assets.

BC Hydro is expected to purchase high-cost electricity from wind plants. Denmark’s electricity utilities were also forced to buy high-cost power giving Denmark one of the highest household electricity costs Europe, at almost 30 cents per kilowatt hour in 2005. In B.C., we pay about 6.5 cents per kilowatt hour now. B.C. families could be looking at a hefty increase in electricity costs to subsidize these feel-good projects.

Some very big companies back wind power so why should B.C. taxpayers be on the hook to subsidize them? The biggest U.S. wind turbine manufacturer, Zond Energy Systems, was owned by Enron and later sold to General Electric. BP and Royal Dutch/Shell, two oil giants, have wind power investments all over the world. Companies like these hardly need our help, but will gladly take it if offered.

Subsidies to wind power projects in B.C. is a wealth transfer from the middle class to the wealthy and will create a welfare-dependent industry in the province, just as they did in Denmark. Taxpayers shouldn’t be subsidizing industry, no matter how momentarily worthy the cause seems to be.

By Maureen Bader

(Maureen Bader is BC director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.)


17 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.