[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Clacton: Trouble blows up for wind farm plan  

A controversial wind farm should be built between Clacton and St Osyth, according to planners.

Anti-wind farm campaigners said they are disappointed with the recommendation for the Earl’s Hall Farm site, off St John’s Road, by Tendring Council officers but they hope councillors, who will make the final decision next week, will vote against the plans.

The planning committee will decide on the application for five 125-metre-high turbines at a meeting at Clacton Town Hall at 7pm, on June 19.

A report by officers to the planning committee says: “The proposal accords with development plan policy and considers that there would be no adverse significant environmental effects, or other over-riding planning objections, which would justify the refusal of planning permission.”

South Tendring Acting to Protect our Local Environment (Staple) said Npower Renewables applied for planning permission for the turbines 16 months ago, but it was not until yesterday – eight days before the meeting – that officers published their conclusions.

A spokesman for the group said: “Staple is disappointed that the planners have decided to ignore the very strong case against the wind power station at Earl’s Hall Farm.

“But it is hopeful that councillors on the development control committee will now exercise judgement at the special meeting on June 19, and recognise the potentially negative consequences of letting the project go ahead.”

The campaigners claim the main issue which will affect the quality of people’s lives is noise, but they also fear proposals for a new estate bordering Little Clacton Road and St John’s Road would not be able to go ahead because it would be less than 1km from the turbines.

By James Dwan


11 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.