LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm ‘a risk to pilots’ 

The lives of young pilots based in Shropshire could be put at risk if controversial plans to build a wind farm get the go ahead, north Shropshire’s MP has warned.

Owen Paterson MP has written to defence secretary Des Browne calling on him to support objections to the proposed wind farm at Norton-in-Hales, near Market Drayton.

In his letter, Mr Paterson expresses concern that the lives of young pilots based at RAF Shawbury could be put at risk by “unnecessary extra dangers” on what is already a demanding course.

He says: “As Shawbury trains helicopter pilots for all three services I am very concerned at the extra risk that this proposal poses to inexperienced pilots.

“It seems quite wrong that young pilots’ lives should be put at risk by unnecessary extra dangers on what is already a demanding course.”

Mr Paterson has also written a 14-page letter to the chief executive of North Shropshire District Council, Nicola Yates, formally objecting to plans for the seven turbine wind farm.

He outlines a number of reasons why he thinks it should not be given approval and also expresses concern about the impact of the proposed wind farm on trainee pilots at RAF Shawbury.

Mr Paterson said: “It is exceptional for me to send a letter of this nature to North Shropshire District Council but I feel strongly that planning authorities such as NSDC are being put under intolerable pressure by the Government to force through its misguided policy on wind energy.

“I believe that this planning proposal would cause lasting damage to my constituents, to the local economy and environment and I hope that it will be rejected at the earliest opportunity.”

Shropshire Star

5 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky