[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Woodford Co. Board postpones wind farm meeting 

It took three hours Thursday night in a crowded school gymnasium for the Woodford County Board to postpone action on the controversial El Paso Wind Farm until its July meeting.

“The actions that I’ve witnessed here tonight make me sick to my stomach,” El Paso Mayor Herb Arbuckle said to the roar of the crowd.

Arbuckle was among 20 people making public comments to the board after an extended fight between board Chairman John Krug and board member Gary Jones on what agenda the board should be using.

Three different board committees voted earlier to bring resolutions to the board about the proposed 40-turbine development by Minneapolis-based Navitas.

The approval of a special-use permit nearly a year ago by the Zoning Board of Appeals included a stipulation that township road commissioners reach an agreement with Navitas on future road maintenance. The project has been stalled for lack of that road maintenance agreement.

County Board members have been battling over whether the board can vote on the project before the maintenance issue is settled and whether the board should seek to broker such an agreement.

The agenda for the May 20 meeting was altered at least three times. When the board finally met that night, it had to adjourn to Thursday night because the crowd was too large for the County Board room.

With the meeting reconvened in the Eureka Middle School gymnasium, Jones challenged Krug’s authority to remove from the earlier agenda a resolution that was recommended by a board committee.

That caused Krug to accuse Jones and board member Larry Whitaker of bullying county Administrator Greg Jackson to place items on the agenda against the recommendations of State’s Attorney Michael Stroh.

“That action of bullying will stop in Woodford County,” Krug said.

Jones countered that “it is crystal clear in our rules” that committee resolutions should be on the agenda.

“It is crystal clear in your mind, not our rules,” Krug said.

Jones persisted that there was a pattern that “rules no longer apply to this chair.”

Krug ruled Jones’ efforts out of order, which caused Jones to challenge Krug’s action and call for a vote of the board.

The board sided with Jones 9-6 and then voted 8-7 that the original May 20 agenda should be valid for Thursday night.

All this and more occurred before the public input part of the agenda and clearly agitated the approximately 200 people, most opposed to the project, who had been waiting on hard bleacher seats.

Many were opponents who say turbines are unsightly and zoning limits tied to them will hamper economic development.

“Look me in the eye and tell me you don’t value my quality of life,” Don Kingdon, former El Paso school board member, told the board. “Do you believe you have the right to take away my lifestyle? How many businesses will not come to El Paso when you put me in the shadow of those blades?”

Board member Thomas Janssen said he will insist that no towers be within 1.5 miles of El Paso.

After extended public comments, some in support of the project and most opposed, the board considered several items before the wind farm issue came up for board discussion.

At Janssen’s suggestion, the board tabled the matter until July.

By Jerry McDowell

Bloomington Pantagraph

29 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon