LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Airport and energy firm ‘not talking’ 

Negotiations have collapsed between Norwich International Airport (NIA) and developers of Hempnall windfarm.

Both Enertrag UK Ltd and the airport have now accused each other of being completely unco-operative and have not been in contact for four months.

The issue is over how the plans for seven wind turbines, measuring up to 125m, on land on Busseys Loke would affect the airport’s operations.

Senior Airport Operations director Elliot Summers said the airport’s principle concern was the turbines showing up on the radar as they turned to face the wind.

He said it would be confusing because aircraft can fly in the area without contacting NIA’s air traffic control

He added: “If the windfarm is built, we may have to avoid Hempnall by five miles and that could create more noise in other areas.”

But Mr Summers said they could not make a final decision whether to object to the development until they had more information.

He said: “I have found Enertrag to be the most unco-operative windfarm developer I have ever met.

“They have tried and failed to consult with us properly.”

David Linley, manager of projects at Enertrag’s Diss office agreed negotiations had not gone well.

He said: “They (NIA) have been most unhelpful with the consultations.

“As far as we are concerned we want to fulfil our commitments as far as the consultation goes.”

He said that there was no safety issue regarding air traffic with the windfarm and said a previous appeal against the airport on a similar issue about a development in Guestwick, near Reepham, had found in Enertrag’s favour.

Mr Linley also said he was not concerned if the airport ultimately objected to the plans.

“I have no worries at all regarding Norwich Airport,” he said.

“If we had an objection from the Ministry of Defence I would be more worried, but as far as we are concerned we don’t have any worries at all about going ahead.”

The application is expected to be determined by South Norfolk Council in late July or early August.

By Luke Page

Diss Express

30 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky