[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ruling on wind farm put on hold  

The fate of a controversial proposal to build a wind farm in Wolverine Canyon remains unknown.

Dozens of critics and supporters showed up Tuesday at the Bingham County Courthouse for a public meeting on Ridgeline

Energy’s quest to erect 150 turbines on more than 20,000 acres in the popular canyon south of Idaho Falls. After nearly three hours, though, county commissioners decided to postpone their decision for a few days.

The Bingham County planning commission on April 23 approved Ridgeline’s request for a conditional-use permit allowing the company to build the farm. Several nearby landowners appealed, however, including former state legislator Stan Hawkins and a company called Natural Guardian Limited Partnership, which is owned by Melaleuca Inc. CEO Frank VanderSloot.

The appeals put the matter before the three-man county commission, which is expected to announce its decision Monday.

Critics say they’re not opposed to wind energy in general, just this project.

Building the wind farm would industrialize the canyon, which is popular among hikers, bikers, climbers, anglers, ATVers and more.

Ridgeline officials say the impact of the farm would be minimal.

“”We’re a very serious company when it comes to environmental impact,”” Vice President Rich Rayhill said.

The project’s been in the works for seven years, he said, adding that the county would serve as a shareholder in the venture.

The problems

Here are a few of the problems with the proposal to build a wind farm in Wolverine Canyon, as noted in appeals filed against the project:

Power production should not be allowed in an area set aside for agricultural use.

The application for the conditional-use permit didn’t contain a site plan drawing.

The planning commission limited the amount of time individuals could testify at public meetings.

The turbines could be placed on another, less valuable site.

Construction of the machines would drive off wildlife and destroy big-game habitat.

Erection of the turbines would cause a huge loss to a historical site.

By Heather Wells

Idaho Falls Post Register

28 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.