[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Turbines ‘won’t be dominant’  

A large-scale energy installation such as Project Hayes would not be the dominant feature of the landscape, an expert witness for Meridian Energy told the Environment Court hearing in Cromwell yesterday.

Peter Rough was cross-examined by the Maniototo Environmental Society’s lawyers on day two of the six-week hearing but disagreed that the 160m-high wind turbines were the main feature.

“It’s subjective analysis. To me if it was the dominant thing, it would be the prime view but the plains are very much a significant feature,” he said.

Meridian has already agreed to relocate some of the turbines to avoid areas of archaeological significance, including from the Taieri Rapids scenic reserve.

But Morrison Kent lawyer Ian Gordon questioned whether moving a turbine 150m was “futile” .

Mr Rough argued that it was better than leaving it where it was.

Dunedin lawyer Neville Marquet, representing two farming families, said there was no doubt the wind farm would create an energy production landscape.

“The dominant feature is not the land it’s on. You cannot separate the machine from the land,” he said.

But Mr Rough argued the rural character of the landscape would prevail.

“The wind farm will be a prominent feature, but it’s not taking over the landscape in its entirety,” he said.

“For example, if you put forestry all over the hills, you would say that it has been transformed into a forest,” he added.

Independent experts involved in the decision to grant consent for Project Hayes found that no turbine locations had such an adverse effect as to warrant their removal.

But in its “project shaping” , Meridian agreed to relocate some of the turbines after entering into negotiations with the Department of Conservation, local iwi and the Historic Places Trust before the hearing.

By Aimee Wilson

The Southland Times

22 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.