| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Eishken’s advisors disagree on negative impact
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The discrepencies of opinion between advisors on the same side of a contencious major wind farm was rammed home at a public inquiry today (wed).
Financier Nicholas Oppenheim wants to build 53 massive turbines at Eishken on Lewis with over half the machines in a national scenic area (NSA).
The remit of the inquiry has a tight focus on the NSA verus the economic benefits.
Louise Cockburn for SNH suggested that Mr Oppenheim hired Phillip Roden to replace Land Use Consultants which, in a important revealation for the inquiry, highlighted in a report it would have an signifcant negative impact on the NSA.
On the other hand Mr Rodden insists its overall integrity would not be compromised.
He also claimed that some people would perceive land by a windfarm to be wild despite the presence of roads and human activity.
A spin-off to the massive scheme would be free sites for a high profile community windfarm but it was previously stated that villagers needed £ 12 million to buy the turbines.
14 May 2008
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=53091 ]
