[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Justice in Freedom?  

Putting aside the merits and flaws of a proposal to build three, 400-foot-tall wind turbines on Beaver Ridge in Freedom, we have to ask: What the heck are local officials thinking?

On May 1, the town’s Board of Appeals heard a request by opponents of the project to revoke a building permit issued to the developers in July 2007. The opponents said work had not “substantially commenced” within the six-month period required by local ordinance.

The appeals board ultimately rejected that argument, deciding that the purchase of wind turbines by the developer was sufficient to meet the ordinance requirements. But it did so with Dave Bridges, a vocal supporter of wind power, as acting chairman of the board.

Just one year ago, Bridges rose to speak in favor of wind at a public hearing in Freedom. At the time, his wife was leading a campaign to overturn the town’s Commercial Development Review Ordinance.

The Bridges family was successful, paving the way for issuance of the permit that was at the heart of the recent appeals board hearing.

Apparently, it was legally permissible for Dave Bridges to preside over the debate last week. The appeals board ordinance does not require a member to recuse himself because of past statements about a pending issue.

But, c’mon, don’t we have higher expectations for government? Why would a local official put himself in such an ethically challenged position?

Appeals board deliberations are the first step in a judicial process that can continue all the way to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court. We surely would not allow a judge to hear a case in which his ability to be impartial was in doubt.

The very first step for ending the damaging debate over wind power in Freedom is to remove every hint of unfairness from the process. That didn’t happen May 1.

By Citizen Editorial Board

Waldo County Citizen


9 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.