[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Controversial El Paso wind farm project sent to County Board  

The Woodford County Road and Bridge Committee voted at its meeting today to send the controversial El Paso wind farm to the County Board for action.

By a 3-2 vote, the committee agreed to place the item on the May 20 agenda where the board, in theory, will either approve, reject or table the nearly 3,000-acre project slated to sit between El Paso and Secor.

The motion was put forth by board member Larry Whitaker who, along with Joel Lemkemann and Committee Chairman Kenneth Uphoff, voted in favor of it. Opposed were Thomas Evans and Stanley Glazier.

Speaking during the meeting, Whitaker said he was frustrated with the fact that the 40-turbine project has been blocked from discussion by the County Board since it won approval from the county’s Zoning Board of Appeals in August.

A lack of an agreement between the developer, Minneapolis-based Navitas Energy, and road commissioners from El Paso, Palestine and Greene townships is currently keeping it on hold. The county’s ZBA recommendation called for an agreement to be in place as a condition for approval.

Bloomington attorney Robert Lenz who represents the three commissioners declined to comment on the vote.

Whitaker said the deadlocked negotiations between the two have tied the board’s hands, preventing it from taking any sort of action, whether favorable or unfavorable, on the issue. Putting it on the agenda, he said, would finally bring about some movement.

By Frank Radosevich II

Peoria Journal Star

7 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.