[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine vote put on hold  

Westport – The fate of the Town Hall wind turbine was again delayed Monday as selectmen held voting on a contract until Wednesday to get more information on costs and other variables.
The town and contractor Steve Pitney, of Alternate Energy, agreed in principal to a contract last week, but some selectmen wanted to find out how much it would cost for the Highway Department to do preliminary and foundation work and how much the cost in materials has risen since Alternate Energy bid on the project more than a year ago.
After more than an hour of debate, the Board of Selectmen voted shortly after 10:30 p.m. Monday to consider the contract on Wednesday, when it meets before Town Meeting begins its second night.
Selectmen Gary Mauk and Robert Rebello, who have opposed the project because they say it won’t produce enough energy, wanted to table a vote on the contract until the next regular selectmen meeting May 19.
The contract considered Monday includes a guarantee the turbine will produce a certain average of energy monthly and a payment schedule that would give Pitney 30 percent of the total cost – $63,400 – up front. But unlike in earlier contract proposals, the 120-foot turbine would now connect to the Highway Department garage instead of Town Hall.
“That’s a significant change,” Mauk said. He said he has opposed the turbine because no one has ever proven that he’s wrong about the project not producing enough energy. Exact figures for increases in material costs are missing, too, he added.
Selectman J. Duncan Albert, who negotiated with Pitney along with Selectman Brian Valcourt and Town Administrator Michael Coughlin, said he wanted to wait on a vote because not all selectmen were given the contract to review last weekend.
Veronica Beaulieu, who was the selectmen chairwoman until losing her re-election bid last month, said at the meeting she doesn’t support the contract because it requires less work of Pitney (the Highway Department will pour the foundation for the tower, work that Pitney originally would have done), and because the performance guarantee requires fewer kilowatt hours of energy a month than an earlier contract signed by selectmen but not Pitney.
Rebello said the location behind Town Hall “doesn’t warrant a turbine.”
“I’ll never vote to have a wind turbine surrounded by trees,” he said.
No motion was made Monday to vote on the contract. A motion by Rebello to hold a vote until May 19 ended in a deadlock because Albert said he had “mixed feelings” and thought the matter should be voted on before then. The contract hasn’t been reviewed by town counsel, Albert said, and legal pitfalls could exist, Coughlin added.
Pitney said at the meeting that materials like steel and concrete were cheaper a year ago but didn’t say exactly how much the costs have risen. Valcourt warned that costs could increase $2,900 within the next week because new prices from the manufacturer will go into effect.
But Albert said he wasn’t worried about the increase and expressed frustration with Pitney for delaying the process by not responding for months to the contract signed by selectmen last October.

By Grant Welker
Herald News Staff Reporter

The Herald News

6 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.