LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ramblers hit out at wind turbine plan 

Ramblers have condemned a decision by Peak District bosses to approve a wind turbine on National Trust land.

The Derbyshire Ramblers’ Association say the decision to allow the turbine on White Edge on the Park’s eastern moors is “astonishing” and would seriously detract from the character of the landscape.

Officers had recommended the application should be refused because it wouldn’t fit in with the landscape – but councillors felt the demand for renewable energy was just too important. There are fears that, if the decision stands, it could become a test case for the highly sensitive landscape of the Peak District.

The final decision will now be taken by the authority’s full council when it meets on May 23 – and ramblers are calling for the decision to be overturned. John Riddall, countryside secretary of the Ramblers’ Derbyshire Dales Group, said: “It is astonishing that the National Trust should have applied for permission.

“It is even more astonishing that the Park’s Planning Committee should vote for the application to be approved.We would describe it as a betrayal of all the National Park is intended to stand for.”

Grindleford Parish Council also objected.

A spokesman for the Peak District National Park Authority said plans for wind turbines were considered “on a case-by-case basis”.

He said: “On balance, planning officers recommended the application be refused but, by a five to four margin, members of the planning committee felt the benefits of introducing a renewable energy scheme outweighed the concerns over the visual impact.”

By Tony Belshaw

The Star

6 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky