[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Peak Park must be protected  

I note from your Peak Time supplement (April 25) that the decision by the Peak Park Planning Committee to approve an application for a wind turbine on the Longshaw Estate is described as being “bold.”

I have two alternative descriptions – irresponsible and misguided.

The Peak Park is a national treasure and, for the benefit of the millions of people who use it, has strict policies and guidelines designed to protect its scenic beauty for the benefit of all. This proposal clearly breaches those policies, along with those designed to protect the Green Belt in general and, as such, should have been rejected.

In failing to do so, the planning committee is guilty of neglecting the duties for which it was appointed and allowing itself to be influenced by some vague notion of “saving the environment”, one of the justifications put forward for this perverse decision. As one well-known journalist remarked when commenting on the subject of wind turbines, “Are these people saying that in order to save the environment we first have to destroy it?”

One wonders which hat the committee vice-chair (who also happens to be the “authority’s spokesperson on climate change!”) was wearing when called upon to vote on the matter. Certainly, her statement “—- I do not think it will impinge on long distance views” is in clear contradiction of the advice the committee were given by their own planning officers who stated, unequivocally, that the structure “— would be seen on the skyline, from public footpaths used by walkers and from the B6054 as far away as the Grouse Inn.”

Let us all hope that when the National Park Authority are called upon to give their verdict on the matter they will give a resounding “yes” in favour of protecting our beautiful countryside (which is what they are there for) and a resounding “no” to this crude and intrusive industrial installation based on technology which will probably be obsolete in 10 years or less.

Sheffield Telegraph

1 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.