[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind turbine battle goes on  

Campaigners scored a victory against the developers of wind turbines on Tuesday.

Plans to build a 60-metre monitoring mast near Tivetshall St Mary by Enertrag UK Ltd were rejected by a South Norfolk Council planning committee.

Members of the public packed the council chamber to see six of seven councillors reject the application, with one abstention. They cited visual and environmental impacts among their reasons.

Developer Enertrag wanted the mast to monitor meteorological conditions for two years before submitting plans to build six wind turbines on land south of Tivetshall St Mary, near Dickleburgh and Shimpling.

Eric Kirby, a committee member for the Tivetshall Action Group, said: “I’m very pleased. It is the right thing, in the wrong place.”

Tivetshall St Mary parish council chairman Graham Mills said he thought the majority of villagers would be pleased with the outcome, based on the level of opposition at meetings.

Parish councils at Gissing, Dickleburgh, Burston and Shimpling and Brockdish all recommended refusal.

But David Linley, manager for projects at Enertrag, was unhappy with the planning committee going against the recommendation of South Norfolk Council officers.

He said: “It (the meeting) was a shambles – there was no decision made on planning law.”

But he added that Enertrag would not be abandoning its plans and that a wind farm could still be built without the monitoring mast.

“I have meetings with the council next week to discuss the best way forward but the application is not dead.”

By Luke Page

Diss Express

25 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter