LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Taxpayers to foot bill if wind turbine affects TV reception 

BBC has warned that over 500 homes at Balmedia could suffer – but committee chooses to back plans

Taxpayers will have to foot the repair bill if a school wind turbine interferes with television signals in a north-east village.

Members of Formartine area committee yesterday backed proposals to erect the turbine at Balmedie Primary in Aberdeenshire – despite warnings from the BBC that televisions in more than 500 homes could be affected.

Planners revealed that the local authority would be responsible for correcting – and paying for – any problems that develop.

In a report that went before the committee yesterday, the head of development management and building standards, Raymond Reid, supported proposals for a 60ft wind turbine. He said it would be positioned around 140ft from the school and 360ft from the nearest house.

However, a consultation with the BBC concluded two television transmitters could be affected if the turbine was erected, impacting the signal in 537 homes.

Mr Reid said the applicant – Aberdeenshire Council – would have to find a solution to the problem at its own expense if that proved to be the case.

Chairman John Loveday said the application had not been thought out properly. This was reiterated by Mid Formartine councillor Jim Gifford, who suggested the school only wanted a turbine because Cults Primary, in Aberdeen, had erected one.

The committee concluded there was no reason to reject the plans under the authority’s planning policy. It agreed to back the application with a number of conditions.

Members insisted on further consultation to establish how much the potential problem with television signals could cost the authority and more consultation with people living in the area.

By Emma Christie

The Press and Journal

23 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky