[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

QEH turbine blown out by MoD fears?  

Military and air ambulance objections could outweigh the green energy advantages of a proposed wind turbine at Lynn’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital.

The turbine could save the hospital £20,000 a year on its electricity bill but there are fears it would interfere with radar equipment at RAF Marham and endanger landings on the helipad paid for by Lynn News readers.

The proposed site for the 80-metre high wind turbine – 20 metres lower than the EcoTech turbine at Swaffham – is the north-eastern corner of the hospital grounds near the Al49.

West Norfolk development control board will hear on Monday that the main aim of the turbine would be to provide energy for the hospital, although it could produce a surplus for the National Grid.

Applicants Ecotricity and QEH also view the project as an important contribution to making West Norfolk a more sustainable borough and achieving renewable energy targets.

Objectors include Defence Estates, who point out that the turbine would be in the line of sight of air traffic control radar at RAF Marham.

Although the air base is 14 kilometres (8.7 miles) away, unacceptable interference would be caused.

Defence Estates, part of the MoD, said: “Following trials in 2005, it was concluded that wind turbines can affect the detection of aircraft flying over or in the vicinity of wind turbines.”

The RAF could be unable to provide a full air traffic radar service in the area of the wind turbine.

Earlier this year, similar objections persuaded Breckland Council to reject a plan for a six-turbine wind farm near Swaffham.

Sterling Aviation, which operates the East Anglian Air Ambulance, also opposes the turbine, saying it could jeopardise safe flight operations.

Ecotricity approached Consultavia, a member of the British Helicopter Advisory Board, for its views.

It stated the turbine would not reduce the approaches to the helipad below minimum guidelines. Round-the-clock lighting of the mast was recommended.

An officers’ report to the board members recommends that the military and air ambulance objections outweigh the undisputed need for more renewable energy sources.

By Mike Last

Lynn News

25 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.