[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind farm plan reduced; Developer hopes to skip review of impact  

A wind farm developer is shrinking a proposal to build turbines in Western Maryland, making the project small enough to be exempt from a major environmental review.

Clipper Windpower Inc. officials say they now want to build 28 turbines instead of 67 along Backbone Mountain in Garrett County. That could make it the first project to be exempt from broad state review under a 2007 law meant to speed up construction of wind farm projects.

Clipper is one of three companies competing to be the first to build wind turbines in Western Maryland. Gov. Martin O’Malley recently announced that the state will ban turbines in state forests, but that decision does not affect Clipper or the other companies that want to build on private land.

Steven B. Larsen, chairman of the Maryland Public Service Commission, said yesterday that his agency will make a decision with-in a week about whether to grant an exemption for Clipper.

More than three quarters of the 30 people who spoke at a public hearing March 6 in Garrett County were opposed to an exemption.

If the PSC approves Clipper’s request, construction of the company’s $120 million wind farm southeast of Oakland could move ahead next year without more study by the Department of Natural Resources to assess the visual impact of the 40-story turbines and how forests and endangered species might be affected by them.

Kevin Rackstraw, a Clipper official, said his company “already went through one of the most extensive environmental reviews ever” in 2003, when the state approved a permit for a 67-turbine project along Backbone Mountain.

That project was delayed by lawsuits from local residents, and the five-year duration of the permit expired March 26. Instead of risking more lawsuits and delays by seeking an extension of the permit, Rackstraw said the company wants to get an exemption from permitting and state review allowed by the 2007 law.

By Tom Pelton
Sun Reporter

Baltimore Sun

24 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch