[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Norfolk MPs express turbine fears 

Conservative MPs representing seats in Norfolk have expressed opposition to plans for new wind farms in the county.

Keith Simpson, Conservative MP for Mid Norfolk, told the House of Commons that plans for turbines at Guestwick have already been rejected three times.

But he fears that a legal obligation to provide more renewable energy could lead to the plans being forced through.

Business minister Pat McFadden denied Mr Simpson’s claim that turbine developers receive subsidies.

Bitter divisions

Mr McFadden highlighted the subsidy available to the public to help prepare submissions during the planning process.

However, other Conservative MPs highlighted their fears over the effect that new wind farms could have on their constituencies.

MP for North West Norfolk, Henry Bellingham, described how bitterly a proposal at Marshland St James has divided the community and branded onshore wind farms “uneconomical”.

Richard Bacon, MP for South Norfolk, said opponents are having to fund their own campaigns.

He went on to criticise what he termed the “potential despoiling of the landscape”.

Christopher Fraser, MP for South West Norfolk, complained that his constituents may be asked to put up with the noise and “visual impact” of extra turbines while receiving no benefits in the way of lower energy bills.

Mr McFadden said Britain needs both onshore and offshore wind farms, and refused to promise any special benefits for people living nearby.

BBC News

22 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky