[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

'Monarch of Glen' windfarms fear  

Planning chiefs draw blanks on Council green energy strategy at Newtonmore meeting.

Planning chiefs were unable to provide answers to some basic questions about Highland Council’s green energy strategy at a public meeting dominated by argument over potential effects of proposed windfarms on a tourism hot-spot.

Leading conservationists and outdoor experts living locally warned that the lifeline industry could be devastated if a proliferation of turbines, proposed for “Monarch of the Glen Country” in Badenoch and Strathspey, were approved.

Fifty people attended the Newtonmore meeting to raise their concerns and seek answers from two senior council planners.

Neither could inform anti windfarm campaigners when “enough” turbines would be built in the north of Scotland or what the council’s target was for reducing the north of Scotland’s carbon emissions.

The issues were prominent at a meeting intended to update Badenoch and Strathspey residents about wider issues contained in a revised West Highland and Islands local plan on which further consultation was promised.

Author and broadcaster Cameron McNeish was applauded after warning that local tourism was threatened by the UK and Scottish Governments’ “knee-jerk reaction” to climate change if it led to “ineffective windfarms” being built beside Loch Laggan and Loch Ericht.

Dick Webster, head of Kingussie High School’s science department, however, defended the technology.

“Far from windfarms decimating the countryside, they produce a lot of sustainable energy,” he said. Unaware of a council target for tackling carbon emissions, principal planner Colin MacKenzie said: “The framework for considering development proposals is set out by way of the national advice, government advice to councils, and that is the basis on which planning applications will be processed.”

He denied that the planning system was balanced in the developers’ favour, as suggested by at least one anti windfarm campaigner present.

Newtonmore resident Robert Nisbet asked what punishment should be expected if the Highlands failed to meet the Government’s green targets.

He asked: “Can we not just be like the French and the Italians and just put the memos to the bottom of the pile and pretend they don’t exist?”

The council panel assumed it was a rhetorical question.

The Press and Journal

16 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.