LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine project waste of money 

The headline was: FPL poll: 80 percent support wind turbines.

Wind, solar, wood chips, cow chips and corn (biofuel) might be good supplements, but they will not solve our energy problems. It is now being reported that generating fuel from food sources (corn, for example) is causing “global hunger.”

Back to wind turbines. Local topography can enhance or restrict wind flow. Downslope winds off mountain ranges represent ideal locations as do narrow mountain passes and river canyons. (I do not think Florida qualifies.) Wind is a renewable energy source, but an erratic one.

Windmills can’t operate at 100 percent efficiency because the structure itself impedes the flow of the wind. The structure also exerts back pressure on the turbine blades as they act like an air foil (a wing on an airplane). Efficiency depends on the actual wind speed.

The maximum efficiency of 44 percent is reached in winds of 18 mph and falls sharply at higher wind speeds. For a reasonable range of winds, the average efficiency is around 20 percent. Why? Simply put, the power capacity in the wind will greatly exceed that which can be obtained by the generator.

Bottom line? For our purposes, windmills are not cost-efficient and would be a waste of money.

Our nuclear power plant on Hutchinson island is quiet, safe (been using nuclear-powered subs for 60 years) and extremely efficient. It can service about 500,000 homes, a lot more than we need at this time.

Ken Price

Port St. Lucie

TCPalm

7 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky