LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Downs wind turbine would flout an act of Parliament 

Regarding last week’s Post article about the Downs being a suitable site for a wind turbine (“Bid for 160ft wind turbine on Downs“, March 28), that such a proposal should even be suggested is an example of how commercial interests would exploit one of Bristol’s most treasured open spaces given the opportunity.

To build a structure made entirely of inorganic materials on such a scale anywhere on the Downs would be to fly directly in the face of the Act of Parliament of 1861, which set aside both Clifton and Durdham Downs for the use of the citizens of Bristol.

This act was felt necessary because it was feared the Downs would be lost to the building industry – which goes to show that the chance to make a quick buck was as prevalent in those days as it is now.

Besides the profit motive, the people behind this idea will now, no doubt, trumpet on about global warming – so perhaps they can tell us just what effect this turbine will have on Bristol’s “carbon footprint”? I suggest it won’t make hardly any difference to Clifton’s “footprint”, let alone Bristol’s.

In addition, can the manufacturers of these turbines tell us how these machines will be recycled at the end of their commercial life – considering the problems the world has in dealing with plastics at the moment?

There must be the equivalent of a few trillion disposable cigarette lighters and plastic bags used in their construction.

Finally, while on the subject of the commercialisation of the Downs, did other Post readers note that Bristol Zoo has, once again, applied for a section of the Downs to be used as a car park?

I do hope that if they did, they will object to this planning application, because if that doesn’t flout the original motives behind the 1861 act, I don’t know what does.

The Downs belong to Bristol – let us keep it that way.

Carl Turville,Redland.

Evening Post

1 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky