[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Pro-wind farm argument is naive, unreasoned and simplistic 

Helen Pick’s letter (March 12) is naive, unreasoned and simplistic. Please allow me to deconstruct the argument.

The people are not NIMBYs as they are exercising the right of free speech and their democratic rights which are enshrined in various legislation from the Magna Carta to the European Convention of Human Rights and Freedoms.

Their right to enjoy their property and possessions and the value of them is protected by protocol number 1 article 1 and government legislation cannot deprive them of that right.

The mythological rural idyll, starving peasants under feudal landowners has changed since mechanisation in the 1880s forced them into industrialised towns.

People now do not work in large quantity on the land so modern day outsiders have moved in, preventing these villages from dying.

The group is not anti wind turbine per se, just that the health issues are not addressed properly. They do not object to off shore sites.

As Mr Grosvenor, chairman of Baumber Windfarm Action Group, works from home, which the government encourages, his carbon footprint is probably relatively small.
I did not see a Chelsea tractor parked at his property, just a not very new small engine capacity car.

A financial advisor may well be required in Baumber when property values fall by up to 60 per cent in some cases and people find themselves in negative equity unable to move.

The planned nuclear power stations will be there regardless of wind power and they will probably be French and have a 100 per cent safety record.

I want to know, will the landowner donate this £64,000 annual rent to the affected community, will the company supply free electricity afterr costs are covered? NO.

So why should the community as a whole suffer for others’ gains?

Another fine exaample of social injustice perpetuated by poor government and inadequate planning legislation which needs to be changed.

Gerry O’Neill
address supplied

Horncastle News

26 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky