LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

SOMERSET: Town Board won't pursue an agreement with Empire Wind Energy 

The Somerset Town Board voted Monday night 3-to-2 to no longer pursue an agreement with Empire State Wind Energy, an Oneida-based company, for a wind farm in Somerset.

Somerset Supervisor Richard Meyers said the company planned to build a wind farm that could have brought $18 million in revenue to the town over a 15-year period, or approximately $1.3 million per year.

Meyers, who was in the minority, said Town Board members who voted against pursuing the agreement with Empire had two objections: “One, they said they (Empire representatives) should have come out to our meeting (Monday), and two, they said, ‘We don’t like the way the host agreement was written.’ ”

“They (Empire) wanted us to agree not to pursue an Article 78 relative to the wind farm,” Meyers said. “They had asked us to reword it (the agreement) and send a final copy.” Meyers said the board, by its 3-2 vote, decided it didn’t want to do that.

Article 78 proceedings are used to challenge actions by agencies and officers of state and local government. Empire had wanted the town to waive its right to sue under Article 78. Meyers explained that if the town sued the state Department of Environmental Conservation, for example, the agreement with Empire would have become null and void.

“I’m disappointed that they decided to stop now instead of giving it our best effort to see this through,” he said of the board’s vote.

“We’re going to get a wind farm here,” Meyers said. “We stood to make considerably more in profit” from an agreement with Empire, than with any other firm, he said.

Now, Meyers said, a payment in lieu of taxes agreement would probably be negotiated at a county level.

“There’s nothing stopping land owners from signing with AES,” he said. “We’ll get a third of the revenue we would have gotten from Empire.”

Lockport Union-Sun & Journal

25 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky