[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Learning about wind  

This is in response to the Sun Journal editorial March 16 about wind power.

The editorial implied that the people of Byron were divided on the issue of a proposed wind project in the town, and that the benefits of wind power were of ancillary consideration to some of Byron’s voters.

There are approximately 80 registered voters in Byron, 74 of whom attended the March 10 town meeting and listened for 3½ hours to speakers for and against, before casting their vote. The project was defeated 69 (93 percent) to 5 (7 percent). Hardly a town divided.

Thanks to the governor’s task force on wind energy, every small, rural town in Maine, particularly in the western mountains region, is in the sights of wind power developers. I agree that the citizens of those towns who want a wind project in their community should raise their hands in invitation to the developers. Conversely, those towns opposed should raise their hands in rejection.

In either case, the people owe it to themselves and their community to become as informed as possible on every aspect of a wind power development project, from construction to living with the aftermath.

There are online resources that can provide solid, factual information on the research, and conclusions by medical doctors, scientists, acoustical and environmental engineers, and just plain folks living with industrial wind turbines atop their mountains.

An informed electorate will most often do what’s right for themselves and their community. The people of Byron were just such an electorate.

Robert Bourassa, Byron

Lewiston Sun Journal

21 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter