LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbines too near homes — claim 

Campaigners battling plans for a wind farm on the outskirts of Sheffield claim the turbines will be too near homes.

Andrew Redfern, chairman of Save Westwood Country Park action group, said the farm would be closer to thousands of homes and schools than accepted safety limits in Scotland, Wales and mainland Europe.

The council has identified the park as a possible site for a wind farm with up to six turbines.

But Mr Redfern told Ecclesfield Parish Council the council had been “duplicitous” over its reaction to plans by a developer for the wind farm with the turbines more than 100m high plus blades 50m higher.

He said they would be only a few hundred metres from thousands of homes in the High Green area – whereas safety distance limits in Europe were two kilometres and one kilometre in Scotland and Wales.

The city council’s North Area Panel is being held tonight at 6.45pm in Lound Junior School, Chapeltown, to discuss a feasibility study for the turbine site.

No planning application has yet been made but Mr Redfern said: “The city council is being duplicitous because it has had talks with developers and it is as good as a done deal which will bring in revenue for the council.”

Mr Redfern said thousands of homes in the High Green area and Barnsley Council’s area and three schools would be much nearer the turbines than in Scotland, Wales and mainland Europe where accepted limits were much further away.

He said this would result in thousands of people being subject to noise from the turbines, the flickering strobe effect of sunlight shining through the turbine blades and homes would be devalued.

But the council’s head of environmental strategy Andy Nolan said: “Whilst we had informal discussions with developers, this has only been to determine the degree of interest in the site.

“The council remains open-minded about the site’s viability. We will, at all stages, take local environmental impacts into consideration.

“We are aware of projects where the nearest house is only 265 metres away from the wind turbine, but the noise at the outside of the house is below the mandatory limit.”

By Tony Belshaw

The Star

12 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky