[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm plans refused 

Plans for a wind farm near Bottesford have been refused in the last few minutes.

South Kesteven District Council planners refused the application from Infinergy to build 10 turbines at Thackson’s Well.

During the debate on the plan Infinergy chief executive Charles Sandham warned Vale of Belvoir residents of an impending “climate catastrophe” and has asked to “borrow the landscape” for 25 years to help address the issue.

Lead planning officer Mark Shipman told committee members before the vote that the plan was one of national importance.

Speaking to South Kesteven District Council’s planning committee, Mr Sandham claimed the Duke of Rutland supports the plan, which has been opposed by his mother, Frances, Duchess of Rutland.

Other speakers in support of the proposal are Mary Fisher, who conducted the visual impact assessment on the site, and an archaeologist addressing concerns raised by English Heritage.

This afternoon six people have spoken in favour of the plan to build the 10 wind turbines at Thackson’s Well, near Bottesford.

More than 150 people attended the morning session of the meeting which will decide whether a wind farm can be built north of Grantham.

South Kesteven District Council’s development control committee is tasked with deciding whether ten 410ft turbines can be built at Thackson’s Well, in the Vale of Belvoir.

This morning, the committee has heard representations from those opposed to the plans in the ballroom at The Guildhall in Grantham.

Campaign group BLOT – Belvoir Locals Opposing Turbines – put forward five speakers, including Justin Barry, who moved to Allington a few months ago and whose wife suffers migraines caused by excessive noise and light.He is concerned about the effect the turbines could have on her health.

A further 15 speakers, including representatives of English Heritage and the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England, and four parish councils have spoken against the plans.

Concerns have also been raised about the effect the turbines could have on nearby Roseland Business Park, at Long Bennington, which employs 700 people at 20 firms.

Solicitor John Roberts, speaking on behalf of the Roseland Group, revealed that a planning application has already been passed to allow concrete firm Bell and Webster to build on the site. If the wind farm application was granted, Bell and Webster’s new office would be just 68 metres away from the closest turbine.

He said: “On that application there was a condition that the office building must not be more than six metres high.

“This was deemed by this committee to be necessary in order not to have an adverse effect on the locality.

“It would be irrational and disproportionate to grant permission for these turbines just 68 metres away from the office.”

The proposed wind turbines are 125 metres high.

The meeting has broken for lunch and will reconvene at 1.10pm to hear submissions from supporters of the plans.

If a decision cannot be reached before 4pm, a further meeting will be held next week.

Keep checking back here for updates and the decision as soon as it is made. We are also videoing proceedings and will post our coverage, interviews and reaction later.

By Jo Hall

Grantham Journal

11 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky