LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windfarm cable should land at Weisdale 

Plans to land a 200 mile long power cable to export power from Shetland’s proposed windfarm have been condemned by a local fish grower as “a double whammy” to his business.

Yesterday (Thursday) it emerged that Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Ltd (SHETL) plan to land the interconnector cable in scenic Weisdale Voe, on Shetland’s west side, after eliminating a shortlist of five other landing sites.

Under the plans, the cable will hook up to the 160 turbine windfarm being planned by community-owned Viking Energy and SHETL’s parent company Scottish & Southern Energy at a convertor station in the Kergord valley.

SHETL will be holding a “public roadshow” revealing their plans, with events at Whiteness and Weisdale Hall and the NAFC Marine Centre, Scalloway on 24 and 25 March.

The company intends to publish its consultation document with detailed plans on its website at www.scottish-southern.co.uk towards the end of next week once it has finalised the wording.

However sea trout hatchery owner Paul Featherstone said he was dismayed at the latest news about the cable landing next to his workplace, saying it would add to the threat of peat runoff into the burn he uses as a water supply.

“I am not keen on the Viking Energy proposal anyway because during the construction period there is no way I can see they can contain the run off from the 16 3.5 megawatt wind turbines going up in my catchment area,” Mr Featherstone said.

“Now I have got this double whammy of the landfall coming into Weisdale Voe and running the interconnector cable right past my hatchery. There will be considerable peat disturbance and the run off into Weisdale burn will kill my fish stone dead.”

SHETL have spent the past year surveying the entire Shetland coastline after being commissioned by National Grid to find a suitable landfall for the cable.

They reduced the options to six sites at Weisdale, Gonfirth, Laxo (three sites) and Skellister before opting for Weisdale as the favourite.

The cable will run from Shetland across the seabed east of Orkney to the Blackhillock substation on the Scottish north coast near Keith, via a landing point at Portgordon.

A company spokesman said they wanted to encourage as many people as possible to respond to the consultation. Feedback would “play an important role in helping to determine whether this is the best route”, he said.

Viking Energy project officer David Thomson welcomed the development as “a sign of steady progress” with their plans to build one of the biggest wind farms in Europe producing 600 megawatts of electricity.

Once the interconnector design has been established Viking Energy will know what their transmission charges are likely to be, a key component in their economic case.

Mr Thomson said he was pleased with the proposal to site a convertor station, a very large building, up the Kergord valley where it would be away from the coast and largely out of sight.

Meanwhile the peat probing work being carried out by environmental consultants for the windfarm developers was concluded last week, allowing the final lay out of the wind turbines to be decided next week.

Statutory bodies like Scottish Natural Heritage will be consulted first before the final plans are presented to the public in a second “Windylights” publication at the end of this month.

Then an environmental impact assessment will be prepared before a planning application is submitted this summer.

By Pete Bevington

The Shetland News

7 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky