[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Canadian Hydro sued over transformer noise  

One of the parties to the Ontario Municipal Board hearing into the Amaranth portion of the Melancthon II (MII Amaranth) has launched a $ 1 million lawsuit against the proponent and a township landowner.

In a statement of claim filed in Superior Court of Justice at Newmarket Feb. 8, Paul Thompson is seeking $1-million from Canadian Hydro Developers Inc. and Mrs. Broeze as compensation for an “actionable nuisance,” plus an additional $250,000 in other damages.

Mr. Thompson is represented by lawyer John Carruthers of the Markham firm of Cattanach, Hindson, Sutton & Van Veldhuizen. He could not be reached Tuesday to determine why the claim was filed in York Region rather than in Dufferin.

He is claiming stress and loss of comfortable enjoyment, both indoors and outdoors, resulting from what he has said is excessive noise from the nearby transformer substation, as well as what he considers to be a reduction in market value of his home – built on a severance from the original family farm.

The claims have yet to be tested in court as well as, to some extent, at the OMB. It was not immediately known what effect, if any, the lawsuit might have on the present OMB hearing.

Mrs. Broeze is the owner of property leased by CHD for its transformer substation. CHD is the proponent of the 87- turbine, 132-megawatt Melancthon II wind farm, of which 22 proposed turbines are in Amaranth. The rest are in Melancthon, where the project has already been approved.

The OMB hearing into MII Amaranth’s 22 was resuming for an expected two days Wednesday.

By Wes Keller
Freelance Reporter

Orangeville Citizen

28 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.