[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Highland Council’s vengeful pursuit of costs 

It seems that protest groups which campaign to save their communities from monstrous wind farm developments are to be broken on the wheel of Scotland’s judicial system.

The Skye Windfarm Action Group (Swag) waged an energetic and commendable campaign against the decision by AMEC and Highland Council to construct giant wind turbines on peatland at Edinbane in Skye. Swag was denied legal aid and forced to fund-raise to take its case to judicial review before the Scottish courts. AMEC and Highland Council then successfully applied to the courts to bring the hearing forward from June 2008 to October 2007, to deny Swag sufficient time to raise the necessary funds to compete effectively.

Following the comprehensive dismissal of Swag’s case by Lord Hodge, who nevertheless sharply criticised AMEC’s environmental statement as falling “far short of the ideal statement”, Highland Council has now applied to the courts for an award of full costs against Swag. This vindictive and malicious move can only be motivated by the desire to scare off other would-be protesters against future proposals to industrialise Scotland’s landscape. It is manifestly unfair vengefully to pursue a small community protest group in this way and it may even be in breach of EU law.

Highland Council seems to have endless access to public funds when it comes to taking action against protest groups such as Swag in the courts, but it would do well to familiarise itself with Article 6 (1) of the European Convention on Human Rights, echoed in Article 10a of EU Directive 85/337/EEC as amended, which on the subject of citizens’ access to “justice at an affordable price” states that “any such procedure shall be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive”.

It is my intention now to seek the immediate intervention of the European Commission on this issue to ensure that the Edinbane protesters are not hung out to dry by Highland Council simply, in the famous words of Voltaire, “pour encourager les autres”.

Struan Stevenson, Conservative MEP, The European Parliament, Brussels.

The Herald

28 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky