LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine OMB to resume 

An ongoing dispute over a proposal for commercial wind turbines in Amaranth will return to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) this week. Township council endorsed a series of outstanding agreements with Canadian Hydro Developers Wednesday evening, though a critical issue has yet to be resolved.

Those approvals open the way for a lengthy OMB hearing to resume. In November, hearing officer Norman Jackson agreed to withhold his order until the agreements approved by council this week were finalized.

He also decreed the hearing would continue to receive more evidence about ongoing and unexplained intermittent noise from an existing transformer station.

“This is a comprehensive package,” township solicitor Jeff Wilker said of the agreements approved by council. They were negotiated “long and hard” with Canadian Hydro, with input from town staff, engineers and consultants, he explained.

The agreements address issues such as road repair and drainage, development, construction, environmental management and emergency preparedness. Icing and turbine-related noise complaint protocols were also endorsed.

Canadian Hydro is seeking approval to erect 22 turbines in Amaranth as part of the Melancthon II Wind Project. The OMB has already approved the construction of 66 turbines in Melancthon Township as part of the same initiative.

Council members offered no explanation of their decision to approve the agreements, despite requests from several residents to delay the matter.

“We believe it is premature for any documentation to be signed…. Perhaps these documents should be part of the OMB hearing when it resumes,” suggested John Lever, who has opposed the project because of, among other reasons, health concerns.

Residents also challenged council on its previous decision to support Canadian Hydro’s proposal. Amaranth agreed to back the project in September, following an OMB-ordered mediation process.

As a result of the mediation council approved site plan control bylaws for the turbines and the developer withdrew 20 appeals to the board.

“You guys bailed out of the OMB and left us,” commented Paul Thompson, who lives near the existing transformer station and has been vocal in his opposition to plans for a second transformer at that location. “You’re supposed to protect us.”

“We have done a considerable amount of work dealing with the noise issue,” Mayor Don MacIver retorted later in the meeting, when prompted by a similar accusation from another resident. The municipality, he said, has spent “hundreds of thousands of dollars” on noise experts and legal costs in an effort to resolve the problem. “It’s still an open issue at the OMB.”

Despite the installation of a sound barrier wall, residents continue to hear an intermittent “hum”, which the acoustical expert and developer have been unable to explain.

The OMB hearing, which initially closed on Oct.18, is scheduled to resume Wednesday.

Matters other than noise from the transformer will not be readdressed during the continuation.

In his Nov. 16 decision, Jackson found that concerns over proximity of turbines to aerodromes (small air strips) have been dealt with and various financial matters between the township and developer have been “carefully analyzed.”

“The board also finds other concerns with wind farms raised generally not to be in accordance with the current provincial policy statement and the current Amaranth official plan,” he wrote.

By Richard Vivian

The Orangeville Banner

25 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky