LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windmill company wants plan reviewed 

Action filed that would force Bear Creek Township to look at revised project proposal.

A company that has battled court rulings in the past two years over building windmills on Penobscot Mountain filed an action Friday in Luzerne County Court to require Bear Creek Township to review the development plan.

Energy Unlimited Inc. requested the Court of Common Pleas to accept an updated land application for the wind project that would supply energy to 16,000 homes. The revised version includes detailed plans and drawings of how the project will be built.

Zoning use variance of the project was granted approval by the Bear Creek Zoning Board and affirmed by the lower courts pending appeal to the state Supreme Court.

If approved, the next step would be obtaining local permits.

The company wants to build 25 windmills, and call this plan “world-class” because it would provide clean and renewable energy for area communities, said project manager Ed Shoener.

According to Shoener, the project would, “improve the environment, help the local economy and generate much-needed tax revenue.”

More than $4 million in fees and taxes would be generated over the 30-year project life. It would cost $102,000 per year and increase over time for the windmills, according to Energy Unlimited. The initial building fee permit fee is estimated to cost $400,000.

Energy Unlimited first appealed the township’s denial of the land that was overturned by a county court judge in August 2006. The ruling decision was appealed to Commonwealth Court, which reversed in February 2007.

By Jen Marckini

The Times Leader

23 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky